AWS RDS vs. AWS Aurora: A Detailed Comparison

When it comes to cloud databases, Amazon Web Services (AWS) offers two popular options: AWS RDS and AWS Aurora. Both are extremely powerful services that offer many features and can scale your business. But the decision on which one to choose can be confusing. Let’s break down the differences between them, so that you can make an informed decision for your business. 

In this article, we’ll take a look at AWS RDS vs. AWS Aurora, investigating their underlying infrastructure, architecture, features, performance, and more. If you want to find out which is the best solution for your cloud-based data storage needs – stay tuned! 

What is Amazon Aurora?

Amazon Aurora is a proprietary relational database service that Amazon Web Services (AWS) offers. It is a MySQL and PostgreSQL-compatible database explicitly designed for cloud-native applications. Aurora allows application developers to write code using standard tools and libraries, such as JDBC drivers for Java and NodeJS packages for JavaScript.

Aurora quickly handles large amounts of data using a distributed storage system that allows for parallel processing and efficient data management. It features a high-performance storage subsystem and customizes its database engines to leverage fast distributed storage.

Amazon Aurora also simplifies and standardizes database clustering and replication, typically complex aspects of database management. As part of Amazon Relational Database Service (Amazon RDS), Aurora simplifies the setup, operation, and scaling of relational databases in the cloud.

What is Amazon RDS?

AWS offers Amazon Relational Database Service (RDS), a platform that simplifies setting up, operating, and scaling a relational database in the AWS cloud. Amazon RDS supports various database engines for data organization and storage. It also handles numerous database management tasks, including data migration, backup, recovery, and patching, allowing businesses to concentrate on more strategic tasks.

Organizations can use RDS to create, operate, manage, and scale a cloud database’s relational instance. The core component of Amazon RDS is the database instance, which can contain one or more databases and can be accessed with the same tools and applications as any standalone database instance.

AWS RDS vs. AWS Aurora: Infrastructure and Architecture

If you’re looking to decide between Amazon Web Services (AWS) Relational Database System (RDS) and Aurora, you’ll have to consider the infrastructure and architecture of each. 

One of the biggest differences between RDS and Aurora is that RDS is an overlay technology based on existing databases such as Oracle, MySQL, and Microsoft SQL Server, while Aurora is a separate option that has been built from the ground up by AWS. 

RDS provides a quick-and-easy setup process with preconfigured parameter settings, while Aurora requires more work upfront to customize data storage. On the plus side, Aurora is able to create vastly different databases for specific use cases. 

In terms of infrastructure, RDS runs on dedicated hardware clusters in AWS’s data centres with certain hardware limitations, while Aurora has virtually unlimited compute and storage scaling capabilities. That said, RDS can be moved easily between regions or Availability Zones within a region without configuration changes, whereas for Aurora, there are associated risks involved with live data transfers. 

AWS RDS vs. AWS Aurora: Features Comparison

When choosing between AWS RDS and Aurora, it’s important to understand the differences between them in terms of features. First off, RDS is a fully managed relational database service that supports six popular database engines, including two versions of MySQL, PostgreSQL, and Oracle. In comparison, Aurora is a proprietary high-performance relational database service designed to deliver high performance at a lower cost. 

Both services offer scalability and automation of administrative tasks, such as patching databases with the latest security updates, backups, and failover support. However, one key difference between RDS and Aurora is that Aurora has built-in fault tolerance and automated failover capability. This makes it easier to provide continuous availability for your databases with minimal downtime or disruption. 

In terms of performance, Aurora provides up to five times better latency than RDS and can scale up to ten times more packed operations per second than MySQL engine in RDS. It also offers an encrypted storage option for better data security. Therefore, if you are looking for high-performance for mission-critical applications or databases with higher levels of security – then Aurora can be the right choice for your needs. 

Connect Effortlessly with Astera Centerprise’s Built-in Connectors

AWS RDS vs. AWS Aurora: Performance Comparison

Choosing the right database is essential for your application’s performance. So, let’s compare the performance of AWS RDS and Aurora. 

In terms of performance, Amazon RDS has a few distinct advantages. It offers a wide range of instance types from several generations of processor technology, including Intel Xeon E5 processors and Intel Xeon Scalable processors (Skylake). It also gives you the flexibility to set up read replicas for increased read throughput, as well as adjust other parameters for enhanced performance. 

 While Amazon Aurora offers greater storage capacity with its own SSDs, Amazon RDS also provides SSD-backed storage options that can enhance performance. Additionally, Amazon RDS offers a wide range of instance types from several generations of processor technology, while Amazon Aurora offers features such as query caching, parallel query execution, table partitioning, memory caching, and index optimizations to help optimize query performance. 

Overall, Amazon Aurora offers better performance than RDS when it comes to data processing and query optimization. Of course, both services have their own advantages and disadvantages in terms of performance—it all depends on your application’s needs. 

AWS RDS vs. AWS Aurora: Security Considerations

When you are choosing between AWS RDS and Amazon Aurora, it is essential to consider the security aspect. Both services offer strong data encryption and authentication options, but they have some distinct differences. 

AWS RDS is a traditional relational database, so it provides several security measures that can be implemented to keep your data safe. It supports access control with Multi-Factor Authentication (MFA), authentication by Identity and Access Management (IAM) users. It also supports encryption for storage and backups via keys managed by Amazon Key Management Service (KMS). Furthermore, it has support for VPC security groups which can limit who has access to your database instance. 

On the other hand, Amazon Aurora is a fully– managed cloud database offering that provides several security features such as: 

• Data encryption in transit via SSL/TLS for connections to your database instance 
• Encryption of data at rest using the AWS Key Management Service (KMS) managed encryption keys 
• Authentication with IAM user credentials or MFA 
• It also supports VPC security groups for controlling network access. 

AWS RDS vs. Aurora: Pricing Comparison

Amazon Aurora instances typically cost more than RDS MySQL or Postgres SQL. With RDS MySQL, users must choose the type and size of the EBS (Elastic Block Storage) volume. They should also confirm that the provisioned EBS IOPs can be supported by their instance type selected since the capacity for EBS IOPs is limited by the capabilities of the instance type.

For Aurora, the only limitation on IOPs comes from the instance type itself. Therefore, users should consider upgrading their instance type to boost IOP performance on Aurora. Amazon’s billing for these services is based on the dataset size and the number of requests per second.

Aurora users are billed at $0.10 per GB per month and $0.20 per 1 million requests, regardless of the instance type. Thus, Aurora can prove to be more expensive for users seeking high performance compared to RDS MySQL, where storage costs vary based on the EBS type and size.

AWS RDS vs. AWS Aurora: Advantages and Disadvantages

Choosing between AWS RDS and Aurora can come down to what your main needs and preferences are. Both are powerful database services, but each has its own pros and cons. 

AWS RDS:

The advantages of AWS RDS include:

• Offers a wide range of features and managed backups for point-in-time recovery 
• Provides performance metrics and reports for close infrastructure monitoring 

The disadvantages of AWS RDS include: 

• Limited scalability and horizontal scalability as RDS does not support sharding 
• Limited availability due to a single point of failure, though Multi-AZ deployments can mitigate this at additional cost 
• Higher cost, especially for advanced features like read replicas 

AWS Aurora:

The advantages of Aurora include:

• Offers up to 5 times better performance than traditional databases 
• Provides up to 15 low-latency read replicas across multiple Availability Zones 
• Supports both MySQL and PostgreSQL database engines 
• Offers managed backups with provisions for future rollback or database restoration 

The disadvantages of Aurora include:

• Limited customization due to proprietary database engine 
• Limited tooling due to relative newness of technology 
• Potential vendor lock-in due to proprietary technology, which may make it harder to migrate away from in the future. 

Ultimately, it’s important to weigh the differences between AWS RDS and Aurora in order to make an informed choice. Consider the infrastructure, architecture, features, performance, and pricing when choosing the right database for your specific use case. 

How to Choose the Right AWS Database Solution for Your Organization?

AWS cloud services enable users to utilize databases without configuring physical hardware, infrastructure, or installing software. However, to determine the best-fit solution for an organization, various factors must be considered, such as performance, high availability, operational cost, management, capacity planning, scalability, security, and monitoring.

When to choose AWS RDS?

Amazon RDS is the best fit when an application needs a managed relational database environment without the struggle of database administration. This service can manage workloads ranging from small to medium-sized applications.

• RDS is perfect for creating and testing database applications quickly. Its ease of setup and management allows developers to focus on application logic rather than database administration.
• RDS offers a cost-effective and reliable solution for applications with predictable workloads and moderate data volumes. It handles routine database tasks, freeing your team to concentrate on application development and maintenance.
• Migrating existing on-premises databases to RDS can streamline operations and reduce management overhead. RDS provides a familiar environment for database administrators, making the transition smoother.
• If the application needs to adhere to specific compliance standards, RDS offers features like encryption, backup, and recovery options to help meet these requirements.
• RDS provides options to scale resources up or down based on the application’s needs, allowing it to optimize costs. Users can pay only for the resources they use.

When to Choose Amazon Aurora?

Amazon Aurora is designed for exceptional performance, scalability, and availability of applications. It’s an apt choice for handling large datasets, low-latency workloads, and applications that experience unpredictable traffic patterns.

• Aurora’s in-memory engine delivers superior performance to traditional relational databases, including RDS with MySQL or PostgreSQL, if the application requires fast query processing, low latency, and high throughput.
• For applications handling massive datasets or experiencing rapid growth, Aurora’s ability to scale computing and storage independently makes it a suitable choice.
• Aurora excels at handling transactional workloads with high concurrency and low latency, making it ideal for applications like online retail, financial systems, and gaming platforms.
• While Aurora is primarily designed for OLTP, it can also be used for data warehousing and business intelligence workloads with appropriate indexing and query optimization.
• Aurora Global Database enables data replication across multiple regions, providing low-latency access to data from anywhere in the world.

How Do AWS RDS & AWS Aurora Work Together?

Amazon Aurora integrates with the Amazon RDS ecosystem, offering an upgrade from standard RDS databases while providing enhanced performance and scalability. By utilizing Aurora within the RDS framework, users gain the benefits of RDS management simplicity along with Aurora’s advanced capabilities. AWS Aurora is a database engine running on the AWS RDS service. This means that when users use Aurora, they still utilize RDS to handle their database’s management and operations. Still, they are explicitly using the Aurora engine to power it.

• When users create an Aurora database instance, they do so through the AWS RDS console, CLI, or API. RDS provides the interface and management tools for deploying Aurora. RDS allows users to scale Aurora instances by modifying the instance size, adjusting storage, and managing read replicas directly through the RDS interface. Aurora’s auto-scaling capabilities work under the RDS management layer.
• RDS handles the administrative tasks for Aurora, such as patching the database software, managing backups, and performing failover operations. It creates backups and stores them in Amazon S3. Users can use the RDS management tools to restore Aurora databases from backups.
• AWS RDS provides monitoring and metrics for Aurora instances through Amazon CloudWatch. Organizations can use the RDS console to view performance metrics, set alarms, and get insights into the operation of the Aurora database.
• Aurora inherits RDS’s security features and settings for Aurora, including encryption, IAM roles, and VPC configurations. This integration ensures that Aurora’s data is secure and access is controlled through RDS’s security tools.

Conclusion

To sum up, when choosing between AWS RDS and AWS Aurora, it’s important to consider the needs of your application and your budget. AWS RDS is a great choice for those searching for more managed database instances. On the contrary, Aurora is better for those looking for a cost-effective and performant solution. Both offer great scalability and availability for their respective use cases. Moreover, both are backed by the reliability of Amazon’s cloud infrastructure. 

No matter which one you choose, it is important to understand the best practices related to performance and scalability. With the help of the right tools, such as Amazon CloudWatch, you can ensure your AWS RDS or Aurora instance is always running at peak performance.  

At the end of the day, managing data can be a daunting task, especially when dealing with cloud-based databases. Working with the right data management products, such as Astera’s suite of high-performance data solutions, can make the process more efficient. With seamless connections to both RDS and Aurora, among other data providers, Astera’s products offer user-friendly interfaces and robust features that help optimize the performance, scalability, and security of your databases. 

You can choose either of the platforms: RDS and Aurora due to their individual pros and cons. Whichever you choose, Astera’s data management solutions can help you overcome the challenges of working with both platforms at once. By streamlining your data integration, management, warehousing, and preparation processes, Astera’s tools can help you take your entire data management process to the next level! 

Seamlessly Integrate AWS RDS and Aurora with Centerprise

Start Now