The generative AI hype train doesn’t appear to be slowing down, with organizational adoption rising from 33% in 2023 to 78% by the end of 2024.

In fact, bigger companies are leading the way in GenAI adoption, with the global AI market projected to grow annually by 36.6% between 2024 and 2030.

However, GenAI growth isn’t following a linear path. Organizations are utilizing different AI approaches, depending on their specific use cases.

This has led to three prominent approaches: LLM applications, AI agents, and AI copilots. The debates around which is best, an AI agent vs. an AI copilot or an LLM vs. an AI agent, kind of miss the point.

The real question is: which one works best for you?

In this article, we’ll examine these three most popular AI solutions, comparing their features, use cases, and considerations to help determine the most suitable option for your needs.

AI Agent vs. Copilot vs. LLM Apps: At a Glance

AI, or generative AI to be more specific, is taking on different forms, each designed for specific functions. The following three are the most popular, and in the simplest of terms, here’s what they do:

• Large Language Model (LLM) applications generate text-based responses,
• AI copilots assist users in real-time,
• AI agents operate autonomously to complete tasks.

Not sure which solution is right for you? Here’s how AI agents, AI copilots, and LLM apps compare to each other across key factors (followed by a deep(er) dive into each one’s key features, use cases, and pros and cons):

Now let’s explore each AI approach in detail:

What is an AI Agent?

AI agents operate with a high degree of autonomy, executing tasks with minimal to zero human oversight. They analyze data, make decisions, and carry out actions based on predefined rules or learned behaviors.

The differentiator for AI agents vs. AI copilots is that while AI copilots assist users in real-time and support decision-making, AI agents are designed to function independently, handling complex workflows and multi-step processes on their own.

Learn More: What Are AI Agents? The Ultimate Enterprise Guide | Astera

Key Features

• Autonomous Task Execution: AI agents can operate with minimal user intervention, automating repetitive and decision-based tasks.
• Context Awareness: These systems process historical and real-time data to make informed decisions.
• Multi-Step Workflow Management: AI agents handle sequential and dependent tasks, ensuring efficiency.
• Integration with Business Systems: AI agents can connect with enterprise tools, databases, and APIs to streamline operations.
• Adaptive Learning: Some AI agents improve over time by analyzing past performance and refining their decision-making processes.

Pros and Cons

AI agents are a great fit for organizations looking to automate structured workflows and decision-making. However, their effectiveness depends on well-defined objectives and continuous monitoring to ensure optimal performance.

Build AI Agents in Hours Instead of Weeks

Astera takes the grunt work out of building AI. Our visual builder lets you design, develop, and deploy AI agents with simple drag-and-drop, a vast library of functions, and a variety of pre-built templates.

Connect With Us to Learn More.

What is an AI Copilot?

Think of AI copilots as your interactive assistants, enhancing productivity by working alongside users in real-time. They’re designed to assist with decision-making, streamline tasks such as research and analysis, and reduce cognitive load without taking full control.

The differentiator of AI copilots vs. AI agents is that unlike AI agents, which operate autonomously, copilots require human input and provide contextual recommendations, guidance, or task automation based on user actions.

Key Features

• Real-Time Assistance: AI copilots suggest actions, provide insights, and automate small tasks as users work. For example, Microsoft Copilot helps users draft emails, summarize meetings, and generate reports within Microsoft 365 apps.
• Context Awareness: These tools analyze user behavior and task history to deliver relevant recommendations. In software development, GitHub Copilot suggests code completions based on previous lines of code.
• Interactive Learning: Many copilots refine their responses based on user feedback and past interactions. Google’s Gemini AI, for instance, tailors responses in Google Docs and Gmail based on usage patterns.
• Seamless Integration: Works within software applications, such as coding environments, CRM systems, or document editors. Salesforce Einstein Copilot, for example, assists sales teams by suggesting follow-ups and analyzing customer interactions.
• Guided Automation: Automates parts of a workflow while keeping users in control. In data analysis, Tableau AI assists with visualizations by recommending charts and insights based on dataset patterns.

Pros and Cons

AI copilots are useful in environments where human judgment is crucial but repetitive tasks impact productivity. By acting as a partner rather than an independent system, they can balance automation with user control.

What is an LLM App?

Large Language Model (LLM) applications are AI-powered tools that generate text-based responses by processing vast amounts of data. These applications rely on pre-trained models to understand natural language, answer questions, summarize content, and assist with language-based tasks.

Unlike AI agents, which can execute actions autonomously, or AI copilots, which provide real-time assistance, LLM apps focus primarily on text generation and knowledge retrieval.

Key Features

• Text Generation: LLM apps create human-like text based on user input. Examples include ChatGPT for conversational AI and Jasper AI for marketing copy.
• Context Understanding: These applications analyze the context of a query to produce relevant and coherent responses. Google’s Gemini AI, for instance, generates context-aware summaries and recommendations.
• Knowledge Retrieval: LLMs pull information from their training data to answer questions or provide insights, as seen in Perplexity AI, which enhances responses with cited sources.
• Multimodal Capabilities: Some LLM apps process not only text but also images and other media types (e.g., OpenAI’s GPT-4 Turbo with vision).
• Customization & Fine-Tuning: Certain LLM-based apps allow businesses to tailor models for domain-specific use cases, such as Anthropic’s Claude AI for legal and financial analysis.

Pros and Cons

LLM apps are useful for organizations and individuals who need efficient content generation and information retrieval. While they excel at processing large volumes of text, they lack the autonomy of AI agents and the interactivity of AI copilots.

AI Agent vs. Copilot vs LLM Apps: 5 Key Differences

AI agents, copilots, and LLM apps all serve distinct roles in automation, decision-making, and user interaction. Below is a breakdown of their core differences:

1.   Autonomy & Intelligence

• AI Agents operate with full autonomy, handling complex workflows, making decisions, and executing tasks without ongoing human input. They continuously learn from data, improving over time.

For instance, a cybersecurity AI agent that detects and mitigates threats in real-time.

• AI Copilots function as assistive tools, requiring user input to finalize decisions. They enhance productivity by offering recommendations rather than acting independently.

For example, Microsoft Copilot suggests edits in Word, but the user applies them.

• LLM Apps are query-driven and lack autonomy. They generate text-based responses but don’t take action or assist in workflows.

For instance, ChatGPT provides answers but doesn’t integrate into a user’s daily tasks.

2.   Task Complexity & Decision-Making

• AI Agents manage multi-step processes, automate decision-making, and adapt dynamically. They handle high-stakes tasks such as fraud detection, supply chain management, and IT automation.
• AI Copilots specialize in enhancing user efficiency by assisting in document creation, coding, or CRM management but don’t execute complex processes on their own.
• LLM Apps focus on content generation and knowledge retrieval but lack the ability to perform actions beyond responding to user queries.

3.   Interaction Model & User Involvement

• AI Agents work independently, taking action with minimal user input. They’re ideal for automating entire workflows, like customer onboarding or IT ticket resolution.
• AI Copilots act as interactive assistants, offering context-aware suggestions while keeping the user in control. Example: GitHub Copilot suggests code but doesn’t write an entire program autonomously.
• LLM Apps function as standalone tools, requiring users to input prompts for every interaction. They do not track workflows or proactively assist users.

4.   Learning & Adaptation

• AI Agents leverage machine learning to refine their decision-making and optimize performance over time.
• AI Copilots may improve through user feedback but generally operate within predefined parameters.
• LLM Apps rely on periodic updates and don’t learn from ongoing interactions. They generate responses based on static training data.

5.   Integration with Business Workflows

• AI Agents deeply integrate into enterprise systems, handling end-to-end automation. Example: An AI-powered RPA bot that extracts data from invoices and updates ERP records.
• AI Copilots can be embedded within software environments to assist users, but don’t drive full automation. Example: Salesforce Einstein Copilot suggests the next best action in a sales process.
• LLM Apps primarily function as standalone text-based tools or APIs that enhance applications but do not actively assist in workflows.

AI Agents vs. Copilots vs. LLM Apps: A Comparison of Use Cases

If You Know Your Data, You Can Build Your AI

Astera empowers domain experts in practically every field to build AI agents in hours instead of weeks. Just drag-and-drop or start with our templates to design, develop, and deploy agents effortlessly.

Learn More

Questions to Ask Before You Choose Between AI Agents, Copilots, & LLM Apps

Selecting the right AI approach, whether it’s an AI agent, copilot, or an LLM app, requires consideration of several factors. These include analyzing your organization’s needs, the complexity of tasks, and the desired level of automation.

Consider asking questions about the following factors before you choose one:

Task Complexity and Autonomy

What is the complexity of the tasks you want AI to perform for you? What level of autonomy are you looking for?

For instance, AI agents handle complex, multi-step workflows with minimal input, making them ideal for cybersecurity, customer service automation, and supply chain optimization.

On the other hand, copilots assist rather than replace users, improving productivity in tasks like coding and financial modeling, whereas LLM applications are best for content creation, research, and summarization but lack autonomous decision-making.

Integration and Deployment

Which internal and/or external systems will the AI need to integrate with and where do you need to deploy it?

Consider that agents require deep integration with enterprise systems for full automation, while copilots enhance specific applications with AI-driven insights. However, LLM applications are easier to deploy via APIs but offer limited workflow automation.

Learning and Adaptability

How important is the AI’s learning and adaptability to your project?

For example, AI agents continuously improve by learning from interactions, copilots refine suggestions based on context, and LLM applications rely on static pre-trained models unless fine-tuned.

Cost and ROI

What are the cost and ROI parameters that you’re considering?

For instance, agents require higher investment but maximize efficiency. Copilots offer quick productivity gains with lower setup costs. LLM applications are cost-effective for content tasks but may need customization for business-specific use.

Strategic Fit

How does the AI approach fit into your overall business strategy?

AI agents are the best choice for full automation. Copilots work well when AI should assist rather than replace expertise. LLM applications suit knowledge-based tasks without deep integration needs. Selecting the right approach depends on balancing automation, usability, and business priorities.

Concluding Thoughts

The three AI approaches we’ve discussed have their own merits, and the choice comes down to your organization’s AI strategy.

Plus, while there are tons of LLM apps and AI copilots available for enterprises, the real challenge lies in building AI agents for unique use cases. That’s where Astera comes in.

Astera AI Agent Builder simplifies end-to-end agentic AI automation with a visual, drag-and-drop platform. By enabling enterprises to build and deploy intelligent automation solutions in-house without deep technical expertise or weeks of coding.

With Astera, you can connect to an LLM of your choice effortlessly to ensure you’re getting the best of both worlds. Astera provides the flexibility to tailor AI to your needs.

Why Choose Astera for Your AI Strategy?

• No-Code AI Development: Build AI agents without any intensive coding through natural language prompts and drag-and-drop functionality.
• Seamless Integration: Connect with your CRMs, ERPs, and databases easily. Leverage Astera’s enterprise-grade ETL for smooth integration.
• Multi-LLM Compatibility: Leverage models like GPT, Claude, and Gemini while maintaining data control.
• Rapid Deployment: Go from concept to production in hours, instead of spending weeks developing and testing products.
• Continuous Optimization: Monitor and refine AI performance with built-in testing and validation features.
• Scalable & Secure: Deploy on-premises or in the cloud with enterprise-grade security.

Transform your workflows with AI that adapts to your business needs. With Astera AI Agent Builder, you can empower every employee to build AI agents without any technical expertise. Build your AI just by knowing your data.

Ready to witness the future of AI agents? Connect with us today to learn more!